Brighton and Hove Local BAP: a Checklist
1. Introduction and background
2. Philosophical reasons for caring about nature - not always 'shopping' and consuming
3. General BAP recommendations
...Eco-Logically comments on LBAP draft..pdf, March 2011 [ 12 pages, 61 kB, click to download] 10 March 2011: Eco-Logically has just received the LBAP 1st Draft! Comments required within a fortnight... so please pass this link on to colleagues also interested in an input to this rather opaque collaboration: ...Copy of Brighton & Hove LBAP draft 1.doc [ 616 kB, click to download]
|
2010 ‘International Year of Biodiversity' may nearly be over but despite Falmer Stadium, lack of Downland grazing and a ‘slash and burn' approach by the council near Wild Park our biodiversity will still survive into 2011. It is a fact that Brighton & Hove still does not have a plan for conserving and enhancing its biodiversity resource. Indeed, there is not even a project proposed within the council to address this glaring gap.
For a whole series of reasons it has taken over a decade for Brighton & Hove City Council to even start drafting a Local Biodiversity Action Plan (LBAP) following ‘ Biodiversity: the UK Action Plan ' (published in 1994). This was discussed in 2001 at the ‘Wildlife Advisory Group' (WAG) established by the council. A report with recommendations on the essential components for producing a LBAP, detailed habitat and species lists were published (Ref: Local Biodiversity Action Plan for Brighton & Hove, May 2003, WAG). This was not progressed and the WAG folded, after receiving no further support from the council from 2009 onward.
Confusing stuff!
Despite attempts to progress biodiversity using the existing guidelines the council has been reluctant to follow these; indeed, a council document discussed on 13 July 2010 stated ‘ The national BAP process has been complicated and rather confusing, '.
There was a suggestion to keep the habitat and species lists as short as possible. This is totally opposite to the concept of diversity! Brighton and Hove's Local Biodiversity is a source of inspiration and joy, to be cherished and nurtured, not kept 'as short as possible'.
Consultation stuffed!
There is a ‘consultation' on a draft LBAP planned for 2011. Below is a table of the main documents, policies, habitats and species which a LBAP should address for Brighton & Hove. This can be used as a CHECKLIST to help compile an intelligent response to the apparently ‘rather confusing' consultation draft.
| Checklists appear like this | ||
| Example item | Further details, references, web-links |
[please note: the check-box does not link to other servers, but is just a simple way for tracking items]
Incidentally, the previous consultation over the Nature Conservation SPD was not used as an opportunity to open discussions with local stakeholders. Instead a ‘Statement of Representations' (August 2009) was presented at an Environment Cabinet Members meeting with the simple ‘No Change' recommended and seemingly ‘rubber-stamped'. An objection to the recommended species planting list was ignored (= ‘No Change') and many plants originating from Asia, United States and central Europe totally unsuited to the Sussex native biodiversity were formally recommended. This includes Virginia creeper Parthenocissus quinquefolia , which is a ‘Schedule 9' species that is both unlawful to plant outside the most urbanized areas and a highly invasive creeper unsuitable for new developments.
What community?
So, please use the checklist below to see if the important biodiversity issues have been addressed. However, it will take a lot more to ensure biodiversity is being progressed with full involvement from local residents, groups and businesses.
Local community involvement should be at the core of drafting, producing and implementing a Local Biodiversity Plan. A ‘Community Engagement Framework' (2009) has been produced by the LSP which could help guide the council in engaging with the community. Unfortunately, all the evidence so far indicates the LBAP will be just another document published, box ticked and then left to languish.
How about an Urban Biosphere?
Biosphere reserves are designated by UNESCO and the council has expended many resources seeking to obtain the ‘Biosphere Reserve' label for Brighton and Hove. A two day conference was devoted to this in 2008. However this will be hard to justify if there is not even a functioning Local BAP network and action plan in place.
At a recent conference on the biosphere reserve application the intention to shortly consult on the LBAP was not mentioned (10 November 2010 ). Also the formal Biodiversity Duty was not covered in any of the talks.
If the Urban Biosphere Reserve accolade is to have a genuine purpose there needs to be clear objectives, targets and action under a Local Biodiversity Action Plan. So far this connection has not been made.
Apart from looking after Local Biodiversity because of the formal Duty there is another reason for caring about nature; its sheer beauty and excitement. Most children know this.
We can reconnect with the pleasure and joy that nature has. But beyond the anthropocentric ‘human-centred me…me…me…' need to possess and consume there is also an intrinsic value within nature.
Whilst the LBAP is the core mechanism which can inspire us all in enhancing our local biodiversity, it must not become just another grey dull council document.
It can start INSPIRATIONALLY!
“Through wise stewardship of the natural world we both improve our environment and nurture ourselves too. By caring about nature we can enhance our own health and freedom; and through this we can access the world in which the human spirit was first born”
We can be bold in providing advice and clearly show that the council has responsibilities to manage its biodiversity, and our natural inheritence, wisely.
This responsibility is stated in both ‘Biodiversity and your duty of care: A guide for Local Authority Elected Members' [South East England Biodiversity Forum, 2009] and ‘Conserving Biodiversity – The UK Approach' which explicitly mentions the intrinsic ethical and philosophical value within nature:
Box 2 – Why conserve biodiversity? Because it is wrong to treat nature as if it has been designed for our convenience and abuse. Because it inspires and enriches our lives (aesthetic/spiritual/cultural services). It enriches many people's lives every day. We are uplifted by nature and our spirit is renewed by contact with it. It provides endless motivation for enquiry, from schoolchildren to scientists. [Source: DEFRA, October 2007] |
There is still no overall project plan for local biodiversity. If a professional project plan is ever drawn up it should include:
- Aim
- Objectives
- Milestones
- Outcomes (a published LBAP being most obvious)
- Costed timetable
This is such basic preparation to managing any project. But it has been almost surreal to experience the difficulties in raising the need for clear project management with the council.
Obviously community involvement will be critically important for planning, action and reporting, so ensure:
Whilst the Council has published virtually nothing on Local Biodiversity there are many published resources available elsewhere. Biodiversity Action Plans operate with a framework which contributes to the international objectives and actions through to local ones. Information, objectives and action 'cascades' across these levels. Monitoring the action progress flows into the reporting at UKBAP level, and ultimately allows us to see the global changes from sustainable development.
Does the draft LBAP refer to the following essential resources setting out national, regional and Sussex biodiversity objectives?
| Checklist : Refers to other objectives? | ||
| The UKBAP | http://www.ukbap.org.uk/ | |
| SE Regional BAP | http://www.sebiodiversity.org.uk/ | |
| Sussex BAP | http://www.biodiversitysussex.org/ | |
Does it mention the International Dimension?
| Checklist : Refers to international aspects? | ||
| The Convention on Biological Diversity which identified the critical link between sustainable development and the natural environment: | http://www.cbd.int/2010/welcome/ | |
| Millennium Development Goals - especially #7, 'Goal 7: Ensure Environmental Sustainability' | http://www.unmillenniumproject.org | |
Does it mention National Guidance?
| Checklist : Refers to national guidance? | ||
| Formal status of the Biodiversity Duty for public agencies | ‘Guidance for Local Authorities on Implementing the Biodiversity Duty ' (DEFRA, 2007) | |
| Planning Policy Statement 9: ‘Biodiversity and Geological Conservation' [PPS9] | Planning Policy Statement 9 states that plan policies and planning decisions should be based on up-to-date information. | |
| Guide to Good Practice for PPS9, describes a number of reasons why this information is needed, including to: | ||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| England Biodiversity Strategy (plus see below for relevant objectives) | 'Working with the Grain of Nature: A Biodiversity Strategy for England'. England Biodiversity Group, 2002. | |
Does it refer to the England Biodiversity Strategy?
Checklist : England Biodiversity Strategy, |
||
| Delivery of local and regional biodiversity objectives by strong, inclusive partnerships with a long term vision and stability for the future. | Links to sustainable partnerships | |
| Local activity takes place and is complementary to national plans and programmes. | ||
| Local priorities and targets are informed by national BAP priorities and targets and vice versa. | Information exchange | |
| Widespread exchange of easily-accessible information, good practice and guidance about local biodiversity activities. | ||
| An effective means of reporting and monitoring progress. | Reporting mechanism | |
| A set of local biodiversity indicators produced to track progress on delivery of the action plan. | ||
| Biodiversity objectives and targets integrated into Council activities, particularly LDF, Sustainable Community Strategy and recognition of local biodiversity objectives in planning policies. | Council core activities | |
| Development of the contribution of local partnerships to the improved communication and understanding of biodiversity. | ||
| Better understanding of the economic drivers which are causing biodiversity loss. | Economic links | |
| Correction of failures in the local economic free-market and implementation of the ‘polluter pays' principle. | ||
| Recognition of biodiversity as a public good. | ||
| Decisions reflect the full costs and benefits of biodiversity. | ||
| Role of biodiversity in local development planning and applications is widely understood and recognised, in a way which contributes to nature conservation and environmental protection. | Development plans | |
| A financial and cultural climate in which funding for biodiversity is encouraged. | ||
| Increased Board-level recognition of biodiversity as a material business issue. | Businesses involved | |
| Increase in the number of companies and businesses with biodiversity objectives included in their Corporate Social Responsibility plan. | ||
| Biodiversity objectives integrated with business management systems to consider all aspects of its activities, products and services, including effects on biodiversity. | ||
| Increase in the number of local company site-related BAPs making measurable contributions to Local BAP objectives. | ||
| Identification and promotion of good practice at sectoral and company level. | ||
| Increase in the number of companies involved in the LBAP partnership, and involved in habitat and species schemes. | ||
| Widespread adoption of biodiversity reporting mechanism to contribute to Local BAP monitoring and reporting. | ||
Does it refer to other Sectors which contribute to Biodiversity?
| Checklist : England Biodiversity Strategy, OTHER SECTORS INVOLVED: |
||
| AGRICULTURE | ||
| The retention and good condition of semi-natural habitats within farming systems. | ||
| The promotion and reward of appropriate land management techniques that benefit semi-natural habitas. | ||
| Conservation, management, restoration and creation of habitats to allow biodiversity to thrive. | ||
| Reverse the losses of farmland biodiversity and the positive management of all farmland features beneficial to biodiversity. | ||
| A sustained increase in the biodiversity value of agriculturally productive land. | ||
| WATER AND WETLANDS | ||
| Water quality targets developed and met for priority BAP habitats. | ||
| Water quantity requirements developed and met for condition assessment of relevant SSSIs | esp. abstraction impacts on Downland aquifer. | |
| Water and wetland habitat conservation is promoted in all policies, plans and projects controlling water level and flood management activities. | esp. local flood impacts. | |
| A programme for prevention and management measures for non-native invasive species established and funded. | NOTE: this is also relevant to urban areas, covered below... | |
| WOODLANDS AND FORESTRY | ||
| Pest issues addressed. | esp. Dutch elm disease and Oak dieback | |
| Provision of more advice to Council Development Control and better monitoring of changes resulting from developments and planning applications. | Ancient woodland and planning appliations | |
| Reduced damaging impacts on woodland from surrounding agricultural practices. | ||
| Improved consideration of pollution and other indirect impacts on woodland biodiversity. | ||
| Improved information on state of woodlands, including parkland and pasture-woodland. | esp. Stanmer Park, Preston Park and Hove Park | |
| Increased proportion of woodland under approved management and protection. | ||
| Guidance on habitat management for woodland, parkland and pasture-woodland. | ||
| Woodlands and trees complementing other habitats, at a landscape scale, and providing for non-woodland species (eg: rides and glades). | ||
| Increased high-quality public access to woodland. | ||
| Increased local involvement in woodlands and biodiversity. | ||
| TOWNS, CITIES AND DEVELOPMENT | ||
| Biodiversity protection, conservation and enhancement objectives in regeneration guidance | esp. Shoreham Harbour development which involves western sections of Hove and Portslade. | |
| New planning legislation and guidance underpinned by sustainable development objectives. | ||
| Planning obligations linked to positive biodiversity objectives. | ||
| New developments build in biodiversity and disseminate good practice. | ||
| Biodiversity conservation and enhancement as an element of brownfield development. | ||
| Key brownfield biodiversity species conserved through site protection, mitigation and habitat creation. | ||
| Understanding and acceptance of how brownfields can make a positive contribution to the ‘green' elements of urban regeneration. | ||
| Biodiversity conservation and enhancement objectives are included in planning applications. | ||
| Natural green spaces and wildlife features are provided as part of planning applications. | ||
| Biodiversity targets incorporated in house-building and other development schemes. | ||
| The use of ‘Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems' (SUDS) as standard practice for all ‘new-build' developments. | ||
| Green buildings designed and constructed as standard practice for all new-build. | ||
| MARINE AND COAST | note: Brighton's legal jurisdiction extends beyond the Marina wall | |
| Development of an ecosystem-based approach to maritime and coastal environmental management. | ||
| Incorporation of biodiversity objectives in flood and coastal defence policy. | ||
| Delivery of maritime habitat and species action plans. | ||
| A coherent legal and administrative framework for nature conservation in the marine and coastal environment. | ||
| Management of alien/invasive species. | in marine/coastal areas, also see below. | |
| Targeted research, survey and monitoring to provide the knowledge required for an ecosystem-based approach to management of the marine environment. | ||
| Increased understanding of climate change impacts on maritime habitats and species. | ||
| Improved monitoring of water quality on maritime areas. | ||
| Increased understanding of biodiversity impact from offshore developments. | esp. 'Rampion' project | |
Does it clearly include Urban aspects which contribute to Biodiversity?
| Checklist : Urban aspects contributing to Biodiversity: | ||
| PARKS AND URBAN GREEN SPACES | ||
| Parks to be managed with biodiversity conservation as a core principle. | Potentially applies to all parks and green spaces. | |
| Large urban parks progress LBAP objectives. | ||
| Relevant parks and urban green spaces protected and managed as local wildlife sites. | ||
| Peat-based compost phased out in horticultural departments and use. | ||
| Pesticide use significantly reduced. | ||
| Water conservation measures are in place. | ||
| Ecological skills employed in all LPA parks and landscape teams. | ||
| Performance indicators for parks linked to biodiversity targets. | ||
| Residents can access natural greenspace within 300m wherever possible. | ||
| CEMETERIES AND CHURCHYARDS | ||
| Cemetary and churchyard management linked to LBAP objectives. | ||
| Increase in woodland and appropriate environment habitats for burial practices. | ||
| New cemetary allocation not leading to a loss or damage to important wildlife sites. | ||
| TRANSPORT CORRIDORS | ||
| Transport corridor management linked to BAP objectives. | esp. rail routes to Lewes and Hassocks | |
| Development along transport corridors does not lead to loss or damage to important wildlife sites. | ||
| GARDENS AND ALLOTMENTS | ||
| Continued increase in wildlife gardening and consequent enhancement of biodiversity in urban and suburban areas. | ||
| Sustainable gardening approaches adopted. | esp. gardening for local wildlife species | |
| Increased participation by local residents . | esp. in ‘citizen science' for biodiversity record centre and LBAP monitoring. | |
| Key gardens and allotments contributing to habitat mosaic protected through planning policy. | esp. adjacent areas recognized in the LDF | |
| Sale of problem exotic plants controlled. | mainly though monitoring and advice at garden centres. | |
| Greater understanding of the value of gardens for biodiversity at the landscape scale. | esp. gardens contributing to the wider habitat mosaic. | |
| SCHOOL GROUNDS | ||
| Schools to be encouraged to develop their grounds for biodiversity objectives. | ||
| Schools encouraged to make use of their grounds as ‘outdoor classrooms'. | ||
| Implementation of ‘School Grounds BAP'. | note: BAP published by the Council, 2004 | |
| SOCIAL INCLUSION AND IMPROVED QUALITY OF LIFE | ||
| Better local environments for people suffering from deprivation. | ||
| Local renewal schemes for residential areas and estates to include biodiversity components. | ||
| Increased provision of trees and greenspace in built environments. | ||
| Environmental and biodiversity proofing within SEU and NRU remits relevant to Brighton & Hove | 'Social Exclusion Unit' and 'Neighbourhood Renewal Unit' link with ‘Accessible Natural Greenspace Standards' (published by Natural England). |
|
| HEALTH | ||
| Local GPs prescribing walks and conservation activities in local greenspaces. | ||
| Local biodiversity areas linked to Local Health Trust and Health Action Zone programmes. | ||
| INVASIVE EXOTIC SPECIES | ||
| Better information and understanding of managing non-native species. | ||
| Promotion of locally appropriate species based on biodiversity objectives. | ||
| Greater understanding of positive biodiversity benefits from non locally-ecological species which are appropriate to local biodiversity objectives. | ||
Does it mention other General Guidance for Local Authorities?
| Checklist : Other general guidance | ||
| Association of Local Government Ecologists guidance on Biodiversity and the LDF. | Integrating Biodiversity Into Local Development Frameworks (ALGE, 2005). | |
| This states key documents to inform the LDF or DPD relating to biodiversity should lead in: | ||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| The Local Government Association's Position Statement on Biodiversity | The Local Government Association Position Statement, welcomes the “…identification of local authorities…to provide a lead for the Local Biodiversity Action Plan (LBAP) process” | |
Does it mention the Council's earlier Sustainability objective?
| Checklist : Council Strategy objective | ||
|
Sustainability Strategy, 2002 , states the objective: | published by Brighton & Hove City Council (2002) |
|
'To achieve our local targets set out in the Sussex Biodiversity Action Plan' |
Does it refer to the other Sussex BAPs?
| Checklist : Sussex Biodiveristy Action Plans | ||
| Sussex Urban Habitat Action Plan, objectives include: | The Sussex Urban HAP, 2001, Biodiversity Partnership | |
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Sussex Biodiversity Opportunity Areas, our area includes: | Objectives highlighted in Biodiversity Opportunity Areas, 2009, produced by the Biodiversity Partnership. | |
| # 32: Brighton and Hove urban green network | ||
| # 33: Benfield to Hangleton | ||
| # 42: Stanmer and Ditchling Downs | ||
| # 43: East Brighton Downs |
Ensure Habitat Objectives include relevant habitats across the whole jurisdiction, not just the easy areas such as ‘School Grounds'. Recently the ' Brighton and Hove Habitat Audit 2007- 2009' identified:
| Habitat Feature (arranged by total area size) | Area (Ha) |
|---|---|
| 1. Arable and horticulture | 1670.81 |
| 2. Built-up areas and gardens | 1463.01 |
| 3. Broadleaved woodland | 253.72 |
| 4. Transport corridor associated verges only | 189.02 |
| 5. Scrub woodland | 181.25 |
| 6. Semi-natural dry grasslands and scrubland | 101.29 |
| 7. Littoral chalk | 32.57 |
| 8. Transport corridor with natural land surface | 35.17 |
| 9. Other littoral sediment | 34.39 |
| 10. Mixed woodland (broadleaved and yew) | 25.91 |
| 11. Chalk grassland | 20.67 |
| 12. Grassland, possibly unimproved | 14.66 |
| 13. Brackish standing water with no sea connection | 7.68 |
| 14. Neutral grassland | 6.18 |
| 15. Maritime cliff and slopes | 4.18 |
| 16. Saline lagoons | 3.67 |
| 17. Other littoral rock | 3.12 |
| 18. Mudflats and sandflats not covered by sea water at low tide | 2.78 |
| 19. Other standing open water and canals | 2.67 |
| 20. Open water (standing/running not specified) | 1.03 |
| 21. Coastal vegetated shingle | 0.80 |
| 22. Standing open water and canals | 0.52 |
| 23. Boulders and rock above the high tide mark | 0.42 |
| 24. Estuary saline water | 0.13 |
Are the following ‘Habitats' included?
Particularly 'Urban areas' as this is THE key area which must not be omitted from the LBAP. About 25% of land is currently within the 'urban area boundary', this will increase once building on the countryside (now termed 'urban fringe') starts.
There is tremendous connectivity between private gardens and opportunities to achieve biodiversity objectives, encourage local awareness of wildlife and to engage residents in raising the status of Brighton's biodiversity. Local awareness and understanding is one of the key objectives of the UKBAP.
| Checklist : Habitats to include | ||
| Woodland | ||
| Wood-pasture and parkland | ||
| Scrub | ||
| Chalk grassland | Internationally important | |
| Mesotrophic Grassland | Areas of grassland that are not strictly calcareous; examples, Hove Lagoon, Spiranthes spiralis grassland near Roedean. | |
| Open standing water | Larger than garden 'ponds' | |
| Ponds | Typically in private gardens | |
| Coastal vegetated shingle | Globally restricted habitat | |
| Maritime cliff and slope | ||
| Brighton Marina | Including maritime and intertidal areas; eg: for sea horse, sponges, ringed plover, former Polygonum maritimum. | |
| Urban areas, particularly important are: | This is THE key area which must not be omitted from the LBAP. | |
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Geologically and Geomorphologically important areas | Specifically included in PPS 9, but often missed out. | |
Regarding Gardens: from 'No Nettles Required: The truth about wildlife gardening'
Ken Thompson, 2006. Eden Project Books , ISBN: 978 1 905 081114 4
This is an interesting non-technical book, Dr Thompson writes:
"….gardens tend to be forgotten. ...since gardens are outside any form of statutory control and it's impossible to know what lives in them. Gardens are a vast resource, but if you don't know what's in them, and you couldn't do anything about it even if you did, you're likely to pretend they don't exist, and that's what the official attitude has been.
Gardens are good wildlife habitat in themselves, and they join up to form a giant, interlinked network that clearly doesn't need much help from railways or canals. This emphasis on corridors not only distracts attention from the gardens that surround them but also makes wildlife gardeners who don't have a corridor at the bottom of the garden feel as if they are wasting their time.
To sum up, up to a third of the entire UK invertebrate fauna occurred in [...an urban Sheffield] garden. Although it's clear that gardens are already extremely rich in wildlife, and that they can provide a home for perhaps half of Britain's native invertebrates, we also know that much of the potential of gardens as wildlife habitats remains untapped.
p.170 Reconnecting with nature
Half the world's population lives in towns and cities. In Britain the proportion is more like 90%. For most of us food comes shrink-wrapped from the supermarket and the closest we get to wildlife is a David Attenborough documentary. We are all born with an innate affection for living things ['biophilia'], an instinctive biophilia, which can be either stifled or nurtured by our early experiences.
...many children now grow up without forging any close personal bond with their local flora and fauna.
What can be done to reconnect people with the natural world? In fact anyone with a garden has their own nature reserve, literally on the doorstep. You can develop a close personal relationship with your wildlife and observe its changing with the seasons."
It is usually stated that species conservation depends upon successful habitat conservation. However a closely grazed downland turf which suits adonis blue butterflies presents a desert to crickets and grasshoppers, including the wartbiter.
Last century there were many species sharing the land across Brighton and Hove with us (refer to the species listed in Local Biodiversity Action Plan for Brighton & Hove, May 2003). Many of these are now locally extinct, or perilously close to extinction. Locally, important biodiversity species hanging on include:
| Checklist : Species | ||
| All bat species, especially | Found in buildings, churches and trees | |
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Wartbiter cricket Decticus verrucivorus | Found on the Downs | |
| Dormouse Muscardinus avellanarius | ||
| Adonis blue butterfly Polyommatus bellargus | ||
| Plants | ||
| pheasants-eye Adonis annua | ||
| red star-thistle Centaurea calcitrapa | ||
| cornflower Centaurea cyanus | ||
| white helleborine Cephalanthera damasonium | a woodland orchid | |
| narrow-leaved helleborine Cephalanthera longifolia | a woodland orchid | |
| basil thyme Clinopodium acinos | ||
| frog orchid Coeloglossum viride | a downland orchid | |
| chalk eyebright Euphrasia pseudokerneri | ||
| red hemp-nettle Galeopsis angustifolia | ||
| early gentian Gentianella amarella ssp. anglica | only found in England | |
| juniper Juniperus communis | small colony remains on the Downs | |
| pennyroyal Mentha pulegium | on the edge of ponds | |
| fly orchid Ophrys insectifera | ||
| early spider orchid Ophrys sphegodes | ||
| burnt orchid Orchis ustulata | ||
| corn buttercup Ranunculus arvensis | ||
| shepherd's needle Scandix pecten-veneris | grows on old walls | |
| field fleawort Tephroseris integrifolia | ||
| spreading hedge parsley Torilis arvensis | ||
| round-headed rampion Phyteuma orbiculare | also called 'Pride of Sussex' | |
John Patmore eco21st
Preston Park
December 2010
Update: 4 April 2011